In a room outdoors the Maryland State Senate chamber final winter, client advocates have been assembly privately with lawmakers to clarify how debtors have been shedding their houses over “zombie” loans, previous second mortgages that they hadn’t heard from lenders about in years. On the time, the legislature was contemplating a invoice to guard householders from unfair makes an attempt to gather these money owed.
Then Robert Enten barged in. The lobbyist for the Maryland Bankers Affiliation started shouting about his opposition to the invoice, in keeping with three folks with data of the occasion who requested to not be recognized discussing a personal dialog. Others started shouting again, and the assembly quickly broke up. Within the weeks after, the invoice handed the Home of Delegates unanimously however stalled within the Senate and died.
“Sadly, we ran up in opposition to a calendar problem,” mentioned Delegate Dana Jones, who co-sponsored the laws within the Home and reintroduced the measure this yr. Enten declined to remark.
The episode highlighted how vehemently opposed elements of the monetary trade have turn into to new client protections for zombie mortgages. Regardless of proof submitted in lawsuits exhibiting some debt collectors have demanded again curiosity for intervals exceeding the statutes of limitations, the trade argues that abuses are uncommon whereas any disruption to the shopping for and promoting of mortgages on the secondary market would hurt dwelling lending extra broadly.
A Bloomberg Information investigation final yr discovered that greater than 600,000 second mortgages taken out earlier than the 2008 monetary disaster — after which largely forgotten amid a wave of mortgage modifications throughout the restoration — stay excellent throughout the nation. Debt collectors purchase these mortgages for pennies on the greenback after which demand householders pay payments that always embrace years of again curiosity.
Practically all states have statutes of limitations that prohibit residential foreclosures if an excessive amount of time has handed. These protections differ from just some years after a debt turns into on account of a decade or extra. Even so, customers who spoke with Bloomberg mentioned they have been unaware of the boundaries when approached by debt collectors.
Consideration on zombie mortgages has been rising as public-interest attorneys file lawsuits and collect proof that their purchasers are the victims of illegal makes an attempt to gather. Many of those advocates say the urgency for states to beef up client protections has elevated for the reason that Trump administration gutted the Client Monetary Safety Bureau final yr.
The company had been elevating the alarm about zombie second mortgages since 2023 and was investigating a minimum of three companies concerned in gathering them, Bloomberg reported final yr. A spokesperson for the CFPB mentioned the enforcement effort has not been deserted, however declined to elaborate.
In states like Maryland, the place Democrats management the legislature and governor’s workplace, measures that might make it simpler for customers to contest unfair payments have confronted resistance. Solely 4 states have managed to move laws addressing zombie loans, and a minimum of one in all them is going through a authorized problem.
A commerce group representing the debt-collection trade mentioned this state-by-state strategy to regulation, somewhat than nationwide guidelines, is inefficient and results in better prices for customers.
“Having one federal commonplace is less complicated to manage than a number of state legal guidelines with totally different necessities,” mentioned Scott Purcell, chief govt officer of the ACA Worldwide, an affiliation for the credit score and collections trade. He added that his group’s members sometimes preserve strong compliance applications for each state and federal legal guidelines.
For debtors, the absence of federal enforcement of client safety legal guidelines exposes them to debt collectors who’ve been accused of exploiting holes within the patchwork of state legal guidelines or ignoring them altogether, in keeping with a assessment of greater than 140 lawsuits. That’s why client advocates have argued for brand spanking new protections in legislatures throughout the US.
“It’s like reinventing the wheel in every state,” mentioned Andrea Bopp Stark, a senior lawyer on the Nationwide Client Regulation Heart, which has proposed mannequin laws to handle zombie loans.
In California, client advocates realized that even after a regulation is adopted, the challenges aren’t over.
In June, Governor Gavin Newsom signed a regulation that requires debt collectors to attest to correct, steady administration of the mortgage, or acknowledge lapses, in the event that they wish to foreclose by way of the state’s swifter, non-judicial course of.
Lower than three months later, commerce teams representing non-public lenders and credit score unions, together with debt assortment companies and several other nameless collectors filed a federal lawsuit contesting the brand new guidelines. They mentioned the measure violated their constitutional rights and would make it tougher for Californians to get credit score.
The regulation “arbitrarily applies to a vastly broader class of mortgage loans than this sort of outlier ‘zombie mortgage’ that the brand new statute was supposed to treatment,” they mentioned in a submitting.
A minimum of one of many corporations that joined the go well with has been immediately concerned in gathering zombie loans in recent times. The plaintiff, ZBS Regulation, managed the foreclosures of a house outdoors San Francisco for a debt purchaser that Bloomberg profiled in October.
The regulation agency mentioned in a authorized submitting that the brand new statute would open it, and different foreclosures companies, to legal responsibility in the event that they didn’t adhere to its “imprecise” necessities. Robert McWhorter, an lawyer at Buchalter representing ZBS and the opposite plaintiffs within the go well with, declined to remark.
California’s Division of Justice, which is defending the regulation, has emphasised in authorized filings that the plaintiffs had did not show that it had brought on a widespread upheaval within the mortgage market. In a authorized temporary this yr, they cited Bloomberg’s reporting on the scope of the zombie mortgage disaster and hurt to customers.
A spokesperson for Legal professional Basic Rob Bonta’s workplace declined to remark. The federal choose listening to the case has but to rule on the state’s effort to dismiss the lawsuit, and the enterprise group’s push to strike down the necessities.
Officers from states which have put client protections in place mentioned the considerations the monetary trade has raised — that prices will go up and other people could have bother getting loans — have up to now not materialized.
Virginia lawmakers handed a brand new provision in 2024 that required debt collectors to signal authorized paperwork testifying that the quantity of again curiosity owed was correct earlier than foreclosing on previous second mortgages. Kristi Kelly, a public-interest lawyer who inspired adoption of the regulation, mentioned zombie foreclosures seemingly stopped within the state for a yr afterward.
When the measure was into consideration, although, some debt collectors mentioned it could make it “too dangerous” for them to pursue even legit money owed, mentioned Delegate Marcus Simon, who sponsored the measure.
“All people tailored to observe the regulation,” mentioned Simon, a Democrat whose district covers a part of the DC suburbs. “It took them a little bit bit longer to foreclose, and it’s a smaller variety of foreclosures. However, on stability, that’s a comparatively small value to keep away from predatory actors taking folks’s houses.”
In Maryland, Delegate Jones, who represents Annapolis and surrounding areas, initially labored with the state’s Workplace of Monetary Regulation to craft a measure that might defend customers from zombie loans, counting on a fancy process for contesting foreclosures. It was whereas legislators have been weighing this draft that the patron advocates met privately with senators, in keeping with folks acquainted with the occasion.
The dialogue was an opportunity for advocates to make the case for why the extra protections have been wanted. It started cordially sufficient. Proponents of the invoice spoke of Marylanders who’d confronted shockingly massive payments on mortgages that they hadn’t heard about in additional than a decade, and the way tough it was to contest debt collectors’ assertions of what was owed.
However when Enten interrupted, the back-room dialogue devolved, the folks mentioned, with the veteran lobbyist slicing others off and pounding his fists. After a couple of minutes, Senator William Smith, who chairs the committee that was debating the invoice, broke the assembly up, saying he’d heard sufficient, in keeping with two of the folks. Smith didn’t reply to questions despatched to his chief of employees. The proposal by no means made it out of Smith’s committee.
By March 2025, Delegate Jones and her colleagues had revised and simplified the invoice, which might bar residential foreclosures 10 years after default. Maryland and Alabama are the one states with no statute of limitation for residential foreclosures. The invoice additionally required debt collectors to supply extra proof that they have been charging an correct quantity of curiosity on second mortgages that had been delinquent for 5 years or extra.
The revised model handed the Home 139-0 final March.
Even in Maryland’s compressed legislative session, the Senate had time to behave final yr. However, in the end, the clock ran out.
In an interview in January, Jones mentioned she was undeterred. “The concept that this could be allowed, that householders who thought they have been secure are being focused at a time when persons are attempting to afford groceries, is unbelievable,” she mentioned.
She’s extra optimistic in regards to the invoice’s passage this yr. The Home accepted it final Thursday, but it surely hasn’t handed out of committee within the Senate.
And there are nonetheless opponents.
Final month, throughout a listening to on the invoice, Enten cautioned delegates in opposition to making adjustments that might restrict banks’ skills to promote loans. “It is a miniscule problem, however a regulation that we’re very a lot afraid could have a severe impression on the secondary market.”
Bloomberg’s evaluation final yr discovered practically 25,000 previous second mortgages are nonetheless excellent in Maryland.
Prime photograph: Kristi Kelly, a public-interest lawyer, in her workplace in Fairfax, Virginia. Photographer: Alyssa Schukar/Bloomberg.
Copyright 2026 Bloomberg.
Subjects
California
Maryland
