When he was a child, Harry Reid seldom left the small city of Searchlight, Nevada, with out his mother and father. However the summer time after his brother Dale had graduated from highschool, he invited younger Harry to affix him in Ash Fork, a tiny dot in Arizona alongside Freeway 40. Dale had discovered work at a gasoline station within the railroad city close to an Indian reservation. Not a lot was memorable concerning the city, the railroad, or the folks Harry met, however he by no means forgot one lesson he discovered there.
Dale’s girlfriend had a youthful brother a few yr older than Harry, they usually spent the summer time enjoying video games collectively. Reid may simply outplay him however invariably misplaced anyway. “I by no means received a recreation,” he wrote a long time later, “as a result of as we obtained into the video games, he would preserve altering the foundations.” He resolved by no means to do the identical himself. He would attempt to perceive the foundations and persist with them. “That’s what I feel life is all about,” he defined. “Don’t change the foundations through the recreation.”
That decision held for greater than 50 years—till it cracked.
By the tip of 2012, Reid was nearly out of persistence. The Senate majority chief had been pissed off, then infuriated, by what he noticed because the tyranny of the minority, which was racking up filibuster after filibuster on President Barack Obama’s judicial nominees.
Lower than a decade earlier than, Reid had been on the opposite aspect of the difficulty. In 2005, he had led a Democratic minority in utilizing the filibuster to dam 10 Republican nominees for appellate courts, prompting Republican Majority Chief Invoice Frist to contemplate invoking the so-called nuclear possibility. Frist had wished to take away the filibuster, which required a supermajority of 60 votes to beat within the Senate, for many judicial nominees, in order that they might obtain a simple up-or-down vote requiring solely a easy majority of 51 senators. Reid had efficiently rallied senators in protection of the filibuster, and Frist had backed down. “The nuclear possibility is gone for our lifetime,” Reid had triumphantly declared.
However now Democrats had been within the majority, and Republicans had been discovering new virtues within the filibuster. In August 2012, Republican Senators Roger Wicker and Lindsey Graham wrote Reid “to precise our concern concerning your current remarks suggesting main adjustments to the foundations of the Senate—adjustments that may severely compromise the rights of the minority.” The Republicans reminded Reid of his 2005 stance.
By the start of 2013, in response to those that knew his considering on the time, Reid was already ready to finish the filibuster for lower-court nominations. Then Obama nominated former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel as his secretary of protection. For the primary time, the Senate filibustered a secretary of protection, and Reid had had sufficient.
“I feel he principally got here into 2013 able to go there and simply get the votes,” Adam Jentleson, Reid’s former deputy chief of employees, instructed me. “So I feel you possibly can most likely discover some statements from him through the course of the yr that there have been no plans. However I feel his personal thoughts was made up, and there have been quite a lot of squishy votes.”
It was greater than the historic nature of the Hagel filibuster that catalyzed Reid to restrict the filibuster, Jentleson mentioned; Republicans additionally blocked Obama sub-Cupboard posts and judges for the D.C. Circuit Court docket of Appeals. The Nationwide Labor Relations Board, a vital physique for unions, couldn’t even get a quorum. Reid defended his motion by saying that guidelines had been modified loads of occasions, and he was downplaying what a watershed this could possibly be. He knew it, and the bulk chief additionally firmly believed that the way forward for the Obama presidency was at stake.
Reid chafed at any criticism that he was being hypocritical, denying that the one distinction between 2013 and 2005 was the get together in energy. He insisted that Senate Minority Chief Mitch McConnell had made it his mission to thwart Obama at each flip and had modified the norms of the Senate. He additionally put his change of place within the context of his evolution on different points, together with abortion, immigration, gun management, and homosexual rights. It was not situational, he argued; it was an indication of maturity.
Reid knew that corralling the votes contained in the caucus is perhaps tough. “There have been half a dozen members that didn’t wish to vote,” Reid’s No. 2, Dick Durbin, later instructed me. “They felt it was the unsuitable resolution. I feel it was a horrible alternative: both preserve with the McConnell manner of stopping these judges via the filibuster or altering the foundations of the Senate in a manner that may have a profound influence.”
Obama, for his half, didn’t actively interact with senators. However he understood the place Reid was coming from. “I feel that Harry was an institutionalist and had nice respect for the Senate traditions,” Obama instructed me in 2022. “By that time, he had witnessed—we had all witnessed—a degree of obstruction when it got here to judicial nominations that we had by no means seen earlier than. What had begun as chosen cases of extremely controversial Supreme Court docket justices being blocked was now a circumstance through which, simply routinely, they had been simply going to forestall a Democratic administration from filling vacancies and on the federal bench. And McConnell was very express concerning the technique. He didn’t want a rationale; it not required that by some means.”
Reid knew he didn’t have the votes within the caucus, that he must, within the phrases of certainly one of his staffers, “lead all of them to water on it.” He slowly and methodically constructed the case that Obama’s judges would by no means be confirmed if a supermajority vote was required. “I needed to be talked into it,” Senator Patty Murray, a member of his management workforce, instructed me. “I needed to actually take into consideration what the method was and what it could imply. And he’d reached his conclusion lengthy earlier than he talked me into it.” Murray mentioned Reid was capable of persuade her and others to make the change “by sharing his frustration. And he was enthusiastic about this, and the necessity to fill the courts and fulfill our duties.”
As Reid lobbied his reluctant caucus members, he would search counsel from the person he changed, Tom Daschle: “I can’t inform you the variety of occasions he lamented how damaged the Senate had change into and would say to me what he mentioned to me on numerous events, ‘Tom, it’s nothing like once you had been right here, once we had been there collectively,’” he instructed me. In Reid’s autobiography, The Good Battlehe had railed towards the Republicans speaking about invoking the nuclear possibility in 2005. He’d mentioned the ebook in 2008 with Daschle on C-SPAN. “What the Republicans got here up with was a technique to change our nation eternally,” Reid had mentioned. “They decided that in the event that they didn’t get each choose they wished, then they had been going to make the Senate identical to the Home of Representatives.”
Filibusters had elevated geometrically since that dialog, however Reid had additionally made the timeless “senatorial saucer” argument to Daschle—that’s, the Home, heated by the passions of the folks, would see its laws tamped down by the extra deliberate Senate. He’d concluded that part of the dialog along with his good friend by saying he believed that invoking the nuclear possibility “would destroy the nation.”
But right here he was, 5 years later, with California’s Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, the final holdouts, able to do what he had mentioned can be the ruination of America. On November 21, realizing he had the votes, Reid invoked the nuclear possibility for all presidential nominees besides potential Supreme Court docket justices, and it handed 52–48. Three Democrats voted towards the foundations change—Carl Levin of Michigan, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Mark Pryor of Arkansas—however Reid had wiggle room.
Republicans, led by McConnell and Home Speaker John Boehner, claimed that the Democrats had been attempting to distract from the poor rollout and tanking approval numbers of the Inexpensive Care Act, and promised that the filibuster vote would come dwelling to roost on the poll field the subsequent yr. After the vote, Reid was elated, whereas one other member of his management workforce, Chuck Schumer, appeared saddened. Schumer and Reid had talked for hours concerning the scheme, however Schumer was a reluctant sure vote—or so he would say later.
After the vote and unbeknownst to Reid, Faiz Shakir, a prime aide who functioned as his bridge to the left, had gathered dozens of progressives right into a room within the Capitol to have fun. A lot of these had been particular pursuits Reid and his workforce had harnessed to stress his colleagues: union activists upset that the NLRB had been stymied, Frequent Trigger members, MoveOn.org people. When Reid entered the room, it thundered with applause. (A number of Reid staffers believed if he may have rounded up the votes to finish the filibuster for laws, he would have performed that, too.) Reid, who not often second-guessed himself, understood on the time that the partisan winds would finally shift. “I didn’t look that far forward,” he later instructed me. “I knew that I wished to get this performed presently. It was one thing that was vital for the physique. I’d fear concerning the future at a later time.”
Shakir instructed me Reid thought of what would possibly occur in a unique state of affairs, however the discussions typically didn’t final lengthy for one cause: “Let’s not be naive. I feel he felt that Hillary Clinton would probably be the subsequent president of the US.”
In January 2017, Donald Trump was sworn in because the forty fifth president. It took McConnell solely three months to invoke the nuclear possibility for confirming Supreme Court docket justices. By the tip of Trump’s first time period, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, and Brett Kavanaugh had every been confirmed by slender majorities. Many on the left blamed Reid for enabling the change; many on the suitable gleefully thanked him as a result of Trump was capable of appoint three high-court members. Reid mentioned none of that trolling bothered him, and others mentioned McConnell didn’t want a precedent to do what he did, that he was simply ready for a Republican Senate and White Home occupant.
Reid continued to insist that he had no regrets for the transfer. Nearly precisely two years after McConnell modified the rule to incorporate high-court justices, Reid revealed an op-ed in The New York Occasions saying that the filibuster had change into an anachronism and wanted to be abolished as a result of the Senate had “change into an unworkable legislative graveyard.”
Reid appeared to actually imagine, regardless of the partisanship that suffused the column, that the Senate had been badly broken. However he was alternately bemused and livid as Democratic senators, a few of whom voted for the 2013 change, expressed purchaser’s regret. “A few Democratic senators in the present day have very quick recollections as a result of they’ve acknowledged publicly on the document that they need that we had not modified the foundations,” Reid mentioned earlier than he died. “That’s the dumbest rattling factor. They had been there. They voted for it. Now to return again and attempt to rewrite historical past is unimaginable.”
After we spoke, the Republican Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama, a onetime Democrat and certainly one of Reid’s closest mates in Congress, chuckled about Reid being in excessive dudgeon. Shelby mentioned he believes that Reid, if equally located, would have performed simply what McConnell did to reinforce the prospects of remaking the Supreme Court docket. “In case you’ve already damaged the glass, why not?” Shelby mentioned wryly.
Schumer, Reid’s shut good friend and ally, had an I-told-you-so second shortly earlier than Reid’s loss of life concerning the 2013 maneuver. “I instructed him I believed it was a nasty thought, however he was simply so fed up and so pissed off,” Schumer instructed me. “I did get him to guarantee that we didn’t go nuclear on Supreme Court docket judges. And look what occurred … McConnell got here in and removed the position straight away. However sure, I believed going nuclear would have unhealthy penalties for us. And on that one, I’ll have been proper.”
This text is customized from Jon Ralston’s new ebook, The Recreation Changer: How Harry Reid Remade the Guidelines and Confirmed Democrats Battle.
Once you purchase a ebook utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
