Questioning find out how to show a Will in India? Supreme Court docket clarifies that even a registered Will wants witness testimony beneath Part 68 Proof Act.
Supreme Court docket (Sept 2025) in Sanjay Bhardwaj v. Narayanrao bhardwaj dominated that even a registered Will in India have to be proved by an testifying witness beneath Part 68 of the Proof Act.
Refer our earlier article on find out how to write a WILL by yourself, “The right way to write a WILL in India? | Obtain Pattern WILL format“.
The right way to Show a Will in India? Supreme Court docket’s 2025 Ruling
Is a Registered Will Sufficient?
Think about this: your father leaves behind a registered Will providing you with his property. None of your siblings increase any objection. You stroll into court docket, assured that the Will is sufficient.
However the choose asks: “The place is the testifying witness?”
Confused? You’re not alone. Many households assume a registered Will is adequate. However on sixth September 2025, within the case of Sanjay S/O Parmanand Bhardwaj v. Narayanrao s/o Ramkrishna Bhardwaj & Ors.the Supreme Court docket of India clarified that beneath Part 68 of the Indian Proof Actit’s obligatory to name a minimum of one testifying witness to show a Will—even when no inheritor disputes it.
This ruling teaches us one factor: paperwork shouldn’t be proof till backed by witnesses.
Q1: What Is Part 68 of the Indian Proof Act?
In easy phrases:
- If a regulation says a doc (like a Will, reward deed, or mortgage) have to be signed by witnesses, then in court docket it’s essential to look at a minimum of one testifying witness to verify it.
- That witness should testify that the testator (the individual making the Will) signed it of their presence.
Consider it like a cricket match. The scoreboard (the Will) reveals the runs, however the umpire (the witness) should verify the runs have been truly scored. With out the umpire, the scoreboard alone received’t rely.
Q2: What Did the Supreme Court docket Say in This Case?
The case concerned two brothers preventing over property.
- Brother 1 (Purchaser) claimed he received the property through a registered Will, energy of legal professional, and sale settlement from their father.
- Brother 2 stated he had already acquired the property years earlier by means of an oral reward.
When the case reached the Supreme Court docket, the bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Sandeep Mehta dominated:
Even when Brother 2 was not a “authorized inheritor” straight contesting the Will, Part 68 should nonetheless be adopted.
A registered Will shouldn’t be sufficient. An testifying witness should verify it in court docket.
The Court docket burdened: this requirement is obligatory, not non-compulsory.
Q3: Why Isn’t Registration of a Will Sufficient?
Many individuals assume, “If the Will is registered with the sub-registrar, why hassle with witnesses?”
Right here’s the reality: registration solely reveals that the doc was filed. It doesn’t show the testator was of sound thoughts, understood the contents, or signed it voluntarily.
For instance:
- Your grandfather indicators a Will leaving you his land.
- You register it the subsequent day.
- Ten years later, in court docket, somebody asks: “Was Grandpa wholesome? Did he know what he was signing?”
- The registrar received’t reply that. Solely a witness who noticed him signal can verify.
That’s why registration alone isn’t sufficient.
This autumn: What If Witnesses Are Useless or Lacking?
Good query! What if each testifying witnesses are not alive or can’t be traced?
The regulation has a backup plan beneath Part 69 of the Proof Act:
- You’ll be able to show the handwriting of the testator and the testifying witnesses.
- For instance, handwriting specialists or folks conversant in their signatures can testify.
This ensures a Will doesn’t fail simply because witnesses are unavailable. But when a minimum of one is alive and reachable, you should name them.
Q5: Can Random Folks Testify As an alternative?
No. A bystander saying “I noticed Grandpa signal one thing as soon as” shouldn’t be sufficient.
The Supreme Court docket has already stated: solely an testifying witness counts. A “stray witness” can’t show the Will.
So, if the Will lists Witness A and Witness B, then solely they (or their handwriting if useless) matter. No person else’s testimony will do.
Q6: What If There Are Suspicious Circumstances?
Courts are additional cautious with Wills as a result of they arrive into impact solely after loss of life. Generally issues look fishy, corresponding to:
- The individual benefiting from the May even drafted it.
- Witnesses don’t know one another.
- The Will excludes pure heirs with out clarification.
In such instances, the propounder (the individual counting on the Will) should present stronger proof to clear doubts.
Instance: When you’re the one little one inheriting every little thing and also you additionally introduced the witnesses, the court docket might ask extra questions earlier than accepting it.
Q7: What Does This Ruling Imply for Households?
This ruling has sensible implications for anybody counting on a Will:
- Don’t assume registration is sufficient. At all times plan for witness testimony.
- Preserve your witnesses identified and out there. Keep away from choosing individuals who might transfer away or be unreachable.
- Doc correctly. If witnesses die, guarantee signatures are identifiable for Part 69.
- Be clear. Courts don’t like hidden arms in Will drafting.
Q8: A Easy Analogy – Cake Baking
Consider proving a Will like baking a cake:
- Registration = baking the cake and displaying the recipe.
- Testifying witness testimony = somebody tasting the cake and confirming it’s yours.
- Part 69 backup = if no tasters exist, handwriting proof is like displaying the oven log and icing sample.
With out tasters or proof, the choose received’t imagine you baked the cake.
Q9: FAQs Folks Ask About Wills
1. Is a handwritten Will legitimate?
Sure, if signed by the testator and attested by two witnesses.
2. What if the Will is notarized however not registered?
Notarization doesn’t change witness requirement. Witness testimony continues to be obligatory.
3. Can I be each beneficiary and witness?
No. A beneficiary mustn’t attest the Will. Courts deal with that as suspicious.
4. Is probate all the time wanted?
In metros like Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata—sure. Elsewhere, not all the time, however proving the Will beneath Part 68 continues to be required.
Guidelines: The right way to Safe Your Will
- Have a minimum of two impartial, reliable witnesses.
- Ideally select witnesses youthful than you (so that they’re alive later).
- Preserve their contact particulars protected.
- Inform your loved ones concerning the Will.
- If registering, do it—however don’t depend on registration alone.
- Evaluate and replace the Will if wanted.
Sensible Suggestions: If You’re Writing a Will Immediately
- Keep away from utilizing shut members of the family as witnesses. Courts might deal with it as suspicious.
- Decide witnesses who’re prone to stay accessible (pals, colleagues, neighbors).
- If potential, have your Will drafted with skilled authorized steering.
- Retailer the unique safely, and inform your executor the place it’s.
Conclusion: Proof Issues Extra Than Paper
The Supreme Court docket’s 2025 ruling in Sanjay Bhardwaj v. Narayanrao bhardwaj reminds us that a Will isn’t just about writing—it’s about proving.
Even when no member of the family contests it, the court docket is not going to skip the witness requirement. Part 68 of the Proof Act makes positive of that.
After a liked one’s loss of life, the very last thing households need is one other struggle in court docket. This ruling teaches us that a number of cautious steps right now—selecting the best witnesses and preserving their particulars—can shield your loved ones’s peace tomorrow.
Convey a witness to carry the Will alive.
Fast Takeaways
- A registered Will alone is not sufficient in India.
- At the very least one testifying witness should testify in court docket beneath Part 68.
- If witnesses are unavailable, Part 69 permits proof by means of handwriting verification.
- A beneficiary ought to by no means act as a witness—it raises suspicion.
- Probate should still be required in cities like Mumbai, Chennai, and Kolkata.
