As Gov. Gavin Newsom spars with President Donald Trump and courts nationwide consideration for a possible presidential bid, at residence he’s catching flak from the left and the correct on well being care.
The California Democrat got here into workplace promising to combat for “assured well being take care of all,” and he got here near reaching it. Actually shut. However because it seems, that’s simpler stated than accomplished when you’re juggling continual price range deficits, rising well being care prices, and shrinking federal help.
Now he’s strolling the superb line between holding his early guarantees to progressives and being tarred as a reckless state govt who has stretched California’s spending past its means.
After years of political infighting, Newsom and the Democratic-controlled legislature in 2024 broadened California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, to all income-eligible youngsters and adults no matter immigration standing.
Now, he’s rolling again these expansions within the title of “fiscal prudence.”
This yr, California froze Medi-Cal enrollment for most adults with out authorized standing, simply two years after making them all eligible. On July 1, immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid — each authorized residents and people with out authorization — will lose entry to state dental protection. Subsequent yr, they’ll have to begin paying month-to-month premiums.
Final month, Newsom proposed letting roughly 200,000 authorized immigrants — asylees, refugees, and others — get lower off from Medi-Cal after Sept. 30, when the federal authorities will cease paying for them.
Advocates are furious.
Progressives say Newsom’s political ambitions — and perceived must distance himself from the polarized subject of immigrant well being care — go towards his early pledges.
“You’re clouded by what Arkansas goes to suppose, or Tennessee goes to suppose, when what California thinks is one thing fully totally different,” stated California state Sen. Caroline Menjivar, chair of the price range subcommittee on well being and human providers.
In the meantime, Republicans and monetary hawks have painted Newsom as a tax-and-spend Democrat prioritizing use of restricted state funds on free well being take care of noncitizens. And Newsom has taken hits from the Trump administration accusing California of “gaming the system” to make use of federal funds for immigrant well being providers.
He’s not the one governor grappling with this dilemma. And all 50 states, which are presently required to present well being protection to refugees, asylees, and others, should determine whether or not to backfill that protection for some 1.4 million authorized immigrants beginning Oct. 1, when a provision of the One Huge Stunning Invoice Act kicks in and leaves states with out federal reimbursement for his or her care.
