FILE – An indication marks the doorway to the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention headquarters Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2025, in Atlanta. (AP Picture/Brynn Anderson, File)
Brynn Anderson/AP/AP
cover caption
toggle caption
Brynn Anderson/AP/AP
President Donald Trump’s administration can’t rescind $600 million in public well being grants allotted to 4 Democratic-led states, for now, a federal decide in Illinois dominated Thursday.
California, Colorado, Illinois and Minnesota sued Wednesday to attempt to block the deliberate funding cuts to packages that observe illness outbreaks and examine well being outcomes of LGBTQ+ individuals and communities of coloration in main cities.
U.S. District Choose Manish Shah stopped the cuts from taking impact for 14 days, saying in his order that the states “have proven that they might endure irreparable hurt from the company motion.” That can hold grant cash flowing from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention to state and metropolis well being departments and their accomplice organizations whereas the problem proceeds.
The primary batch of grants might have been pulled Thursday if the decide had not intervened, Colorado Lawyer Normal Phil Weiser stated.
The Division of Well being and Human Providers stated the grants are being terminated as a result of they don’t replicate CDC priorities, which have been revised final yr to align with the administration’s shift away from well being fairness, the concept that sure populations may have extra assist to eradicate well being disparities.
A lot of the cash helped cities struggle the unfold of HIV and different sexually transmitted infections, particularly amongst homosexual and bisexual males, adolescents and ethnic minorities.
Federal well being officers didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon the decide’s order.
Officers within the 4 states are amongst Trump’s strongest political foes and think about the cuts as retaliation for opposing his immigration enforcement crackdown. All have been targets of different federal cuts, together with for meals help packages, baby care subsidies and electrical car infrastructure.
Their lawsuit, led by Illinois Lawyer Normal Kwame Raoul, argues that the well being care cuts violate the Structure by imposing retroactive situations on funding that Congress already awarded.
“Focusing on 4 Democrat-run states which can be standing as much as his utterly unrelated immigration insurance policies is a clear try and bully us into compliance,” Raoul stated. “The president could also be taking part in politics with crucial public well being funding, together with greater than $100 million to Illinois, however our residents are those who pay the value.”
The attorneys common say the lack of funding would pressure them to put off a whole bunch of public well being employees.
Minnesota Lawyer Normal Keith Ellison stated they are going to search to increase the decide’s pause throughout the lawsuit.
Courts have briefly blocked related efforts by the Trump administration, together with a plan to chop off billions for baby care subsidies and different packages for low-income households within the 4 states, plus New York.
