This text is a part of a sponsored sequence by Skilled Insured.
In 2025, MGAs and carriers aren’t debating whether or not to automate – they’re debating the place. Ought to submissions be routed by electronic mail and OCR triage? Or pushed by a full-blown API quoting expertise?
This weblog breaks down when to make use of email-based consumption (backed by AI + human ops), when to lean on API quoting, and the right way to mix each relying in your provider connectivity, information hygiene, and scale.
The Case for API Quoting
Greatest For: Carriers with clear API entry, program managers with identified guidelines, low-friction LOBs
Execs:
- Prompt price response, typically <2s
- No human overview if information is clear
- Can combine with CRMs or front-end portals
- Trackable – quote logs, success/fail information
Cons:
- Solely works with taking part carriers
- Can fail silently if information is malformed
- Requires structured consumption (kinds, required fields)
The Case for E-mail-Primarily based Consumption + AI OCR
Greatest For: Dealer submissions, multi-LOB applications, carriers with out APIs
Execs:
- Accepts real-world consumption – binders, insurance coverage app kinds, spreadsheets
- GPT + OCR classify and extract for quoting
- Extra versatile for mid-market applications
- Simpler to onboard: works on day one with inbox + entry
Cons:
- Requires QA fallbacks
- Barely slower: 2-4 hour quoting SLA vs real-time API
- Information inconsistency can improve triage effort
Selectsys Blends Each: Hybrid Quoting Layer
| Situation | What Selectsys Makes use of |
| Retail dealer sends electronic mail | GPT classifier → RQB prep → BPO QA |
| API-ready submission by way of portal | Direct RQB API name → return quote |
| PDF + consumption type submission | OCR → area extraction → quote set off |
| Lacking provider urge for food information | Path to underwriter for determination |
Check Case
Shopper: Mid-sized MGA with 12 applications, 4 API-enabled, 8 email-only
Earlier than:
- Quoting was 100% handbook
- 3 underwriters dealt with consumption → quote prep → bind requests
After Selectsys:
- API submissions routed instantly by RQB
- Non-API emails labeled by GPT, triaged by Selectsys ops
- Quote quantity doubled with no improve in underwriter workload
- Bind turnaround dropped from 2 days → underneath 8 hours
FAQs
Can I take advantage of RQB with each API and handbook submissions?
Sure. RQB helps hybrid workflows – utilizing APIs when out there and fallback workflows (electronic mail, doc consumption) when not.
What occurs if the API fails or provider doesn’t reply?
The quote is flagged, and a Selectsys underwriter or BPO crew member follows up by way of handbook quoting.
How do you deal with totally different LOBs in the identical submission?
RQB chains quotes by line – triggering API if supported, fallback to handbook in any other case.
Do we have to format emails or attachments a sure means?
No. Our GPT classifier reads unstructured emails and attachments.
Can producers submit by way of portal as an alternative of electronic mail?
Sure. We are able to embed RQB into portals or CRMs to set off quotes mechanically.
Automate The place You Can. Route Intelligently The place You Can’t.
Let Selectsys deal with quoting with the correct mix of API pace and human oversight.
Fascinated about Automation Optimization?
Get computerized alerts for this subject.
